<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MooTools vs JQuery vs Prototype vs YUI vs Dojo Comparison Revised</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised</link>
	<description>...looking for more than eyes can see</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimbus</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-72879</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-72879</guid>
		<description>What do the number mean in the charts? The articles seems well thought out but if you have not used slickspeed before the numbers don&#039;t really have any meaning.   Do the number represent the number of actions over a fixed time or do they represent the time required for a fixed number of actions?  And which actions and time? 

Thanks for the article though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the number mean in the charts? The articles seems well thought out but if you have not used slickspeed before the numbers don&#8217;t really have any meaning.   Do the number represent the number of actions over a fixed time or do they represent the time required for a fixed number of actions?  And which actions and time? </p>
<p>Thanks for the article though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-72848</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-72848</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing lower is better?

You really should leave some kind of comment somewhere explaining that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing lower is better?</p>
<p>You really should leave some kind of comment somewhere explaining that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparision: Prototype, Dojo, jQuery, mootools and SmartClient AJAX RIA Frameworks &#124; vermashailendra</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-72730</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparision: Prototype, Dojo, jQuery, mootools and SmartClient AJAX RIA Frameworks &#124; vermashailendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-72730</guid>
		<description>[...] AJAX RIA Frameworks. Below are my findings on the same: 1. Prototype framework favorable links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /List_of_Ajax_frameworks http://www.javabeat.net/articles/12-comparison-of-ajax-frameworks-prototype-gwt-dwr-and-1.html [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AJAX RIA Frameworks. Below are my findings on the same: 1. Prototype framework favorable links: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</a> /List_of_Ajax_frameworks <a href="http://www.javabeat.net/articles/12-comparison-of-ajax-frameworks-prototype-gwt-dwr-and-1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.javabeat.net/articles/12-comparison-of-ajax-frameworks-prototype-gwt-dwr-and-1.html</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-72635</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-72635</guid>
		<description>Great comparison.  Thanks for the write-up.  &#039;Would love to see it updated to latest versions if you get time-

Thanks again-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comparison.  Thanks for the write-up.  &#8216;Would love to see it updated to latest versions if you get time-</p>
<p>Thanks again-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-72264</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 11:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-72264</guid>
		<description>A really nice comparison and helpful comments, as some commenter said,  it would be a help to write that shorter is better and a new test using the newest builds, for example YUI 3.3. Thank you Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really nice comparison and helpful comments, as some commenter said,  it would be a help to write that shorter is better and a new test using the newest builds, for example YUI 3.3. Thank you Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webdesigner</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-72260</link>
		<dc:creator>webdesigner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-72260</guid>
		<description>thanks for sharing with the useful info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing with the useful info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aeuce</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-72144</link>
		<dc:creator>Aeuce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-72144</guid>
		<description>For all who are asking questions like: Which are better - long or short?

If you are reading this article, then you should _really_ know this. Why would you read it if you don&#039;t understand even basic browser measurements, or even javascript? (Which, if you did not know, what this article is _all_ about)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all who are asking questions like: Which are better &#8211; long or short?</p>
<p>If you are reading this article, then you should _really_ know this. Why would you read it if you don&#8217;t understand even basic browser measurements, or even javascript? (Which, if you did not know, what this article is _all_ about)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JavaScript keretrendszerek &#246;sszevet&#233;se &#171; Szoftver aktualitások</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-72132</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaScript keretrendszerek &#246;sszevet&#233;se &#171; Szoftver aktualitások</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-72132</guid>
		<description>[...] MooTools vs jQuery vs Prototype vs YUI vs Dojo Comparison Revised (2009. január 16., updated: 2009. február 3.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MooTools vs jQuery vs Prototype vs YUI vs Dojo Comparison Revised (2009. január 16., updated: 2009. február 3.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naman</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-69264</link>
		<dc:creator>Naman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-69264</guid>
		<description>Hey thanks for this, Peter. 

I&#039;ve to pick a JS framework for a  JS heavy app. No DOM functionality, CSS support doesn&#039;t matter; it&#039;ll be mainly widgets that interact with each other and the server with ajax calls. So events, code architecture, performance make all the difference. 

After looking through this post and all the given links, I&#039;m leaning very heavily toward YUI because of the architecture. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks for this, Peter. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve to pick a JS framework for a  JS heavy app. No DOM functionality, CSS support doesn&#8217;t matter; it&#8217;ll be mainly widgets that interact with each other and the server with ajax calls. So events, code architecture, performance make all the difference. </p>
<p>After looking through this post and all the given links, I&#8217;m leaning very heavily toward YUI because of the architecture. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/mootools-vs-jquery-vs-prototype-vs-yui-vs-dojo-comparison-revised/comment-page-2#comment-35469</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creonfx.com/?p=154#comment-35469</guid>
		<description>Thanks, great article and interesting comments.  I recently chose jQuery to include for fancy stuff in the intranet web application I developed with Java, JSP :)  I&#039;ll also move AJAX handling to it when I can - good riddance, but at least now I know AJAX well.  This article made me consider YUI more closely.  I actually just saw it in another app we use when I just thought to check what it might be using.  I guess I&#039;ll stick with jQuery though.  The different syntax is a bit annoying, though nice to be less verbose, but it seems like jQuery has the most momentum behind it.  Is this true? I don&#039;t need a ton of features, just really basic stuff, so I was planning on using jQuery without plugins if possible.  They actually just added the one thing I was looking for to start small with - Tooltips.

Peter, you recommend jQuery (or mootools) over YUI in the comments.  What are the reasons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, great article and interesting comments.  I recently chose jQuery to include for fancy stuff in the intranet web application I developed with Java, JSP <img src='http://blog.creonfx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;ll also move AJAX handling to it when I can &#8211; good riddance, but at least now I know AJAX well.  This article made me consider YUI more closely.  I actually just saw it in another app we use when I just thought to check what it might be using.  I guess I&#8217;ll stick with jQuery though.  The different syntax is a bit annoying, though nice to be less verbose, but it seems like jQuery has the most momentum behind it.  Is this true? I don&#8217;t need a ton of features, just really basic stuff, so I was planning on using jQuery without plugins if possible.  They actually just added the one thing I was looking for to start small with &#8211; Tooltips.</p>
<p>Peter, you recommend jQuery (or mootools) over YUI in the comments.  What are the reasons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

