Comments on: Dojo vs JQuery vs MooTools vs Prototype Performance Comparison

By: Saumya

Saumya — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:27:16 +0000

Thanks for the information. Its help me lots……

By: hanghang

hanghang — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:11:37 +0000

Thank you.Your data helps me a lot.

By: deerawan

deerawan — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:45:33 +0000

wow..nice benchmark. I confuse to choose between Jquery and dojo but after I see the benchmark, I know that dojo is the best.

By: Webagentur

Webagentur — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:15:45 +0000

Thank you … this has me very helped.

By: Mini tutorial sobre Frameworks Ajax E Ajax « Weber Scripts

Mini tutorial sobre Frameworks Ajax E Ajax « Weber Scripts — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:51:31 +0000

[...] aqui… Comparação entre os frameworks com gráficos bacanas http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/dojo-vs-jquery-vs-mootools-vs-prototype-performance-comparison referências A Method for Model Based Design of Rich Internet Application Interactive User [...]

By: Peter

Peter — Tue, 26 May 2009 05:54:41 +0000

@R-tree – ms excel

By: R-tree

R-tree — Tue, 26 May 2009 04:48:55 +0000

Hi~ Which tool does generate the beautiful chart?

By: The YPI

The YPI — Mon, 11 May 2009 09:16:29 +0000

Thanks for this fantastic comparison

By: Steve Holden

Steve Holden — Sat, 09 May 2009 09:07:34 +0000

Always good to see more benchmarking information. Having used both Dojo and Jquery (but not the others you mention) I was somewhat disappointed to discover that Dojo appeared to cause pages to initially render without Dojo-applied styling, causing a rather unpleasant visual flashing as objects were replaced by their fully-styled counterparts.

Is this a known issue with Dojo which I was perhaps triggering by some omission? To me (in limited testing on FF 2.X and 3.0 under Windows Vista and Ubuntu) Jquery seems to have the edge for user experience.

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:18:02 +0000

@manny Yahoo’s javascript compressor is safe and should not lead to any problems with chrome.